ELECTION HUSTINGS OR HUSTLING ? – Everything is Not Always as it Seems – Especially at Election Time

Share Button

promises 2Election Hustings or Hustling 
Read full article by a member of No Fracking Ireland here: Election Hustling,
 ‘Stop the Study’, unraveled, an inside in the role of  GEAI, FG and more…..

Sit down, take your time, GET INFORMED  and read the whole story

Reply from GEAI: Stop the Study Timeline
stop the study timeline pdf

The ‘offical’ statement from DCENR according to GEAI
husting or hustling

Election Hustling  pdf
Reply from GEAI: Stop the Study Timeline

Sources, coverage in the media incl. Comments
Continue reading

Over 3 years of GEAI-EPA articles – UPDATED FEB 2016, incl. comments

Share Button


Timeline Stop the Study – http://goodenergiesalliance.com/geai-partisipation/

Stop the Study Timeline  (updated Feb. 2016)
stop the study timeline

No public confidence in EPA Fracking study – Colreavyhttp://www.sinnfein.ie/contents/37495

EPA and JOC video and transcripthttp://goodenergiesalliance.com/2016/01/12/epa-and-joc-video-and-transcript/

Stop the study rally and presentationshttp://goodenergiesalliance.com/2015/11/06/stop-the-study-rally-and-presentations/

Study on Fracking in Ireland is Discredited.
Press Releases – http://goodenergiesalliance.com/press-releases/————————————————————————————————————-
Election Hustings or Hustlinghttp://frackingfreeireland.org/2016/02/18/election-hustings-or-hustling-everything-is-not-always-as-it-seems-especially-at-election-time-2/For the duration of their time in power the Fine Gael / Labour government in Ireland have left the threat of fracking, a most intrusive, dangerous, destructive and corrupt, ponzi scheme, disguised as an energy plan, hanging like a dark cloud over rural communities all over this country. The same government, using our money, then ordered the EPA to do a research study into “fracking”. On examination of the detail of this EPA research study, many of us in the anti fracking campaign quickly realised it was a sham, led by industry insiders and basically designed to lay down the foundations for the industry and ultimately give fracking the green light in Ireland. Since the EPA study was launched, many of us in the antifracking campaign have been calling for it to be immediately and permanently scrapped. We do not need any more studies on fracking, we have all the evidence we need, from scientists all over the world, to use the precautionary principle and like France, place a ban on fracking in Ireland.On the very first day the election was called, February 3rd, Good Energies Alliance Ireland (GEAI), a government funded company, based in north Leitrim, who are involved at certain levels, in the campaign against fracking and Tony McLoughlin Fine Gael TD for Sligo/Leitrim both released statements announcing that the EPA’s scandalous, research study into fracking had been “stopped”. “Good News! It’s Official”, was the headline of the announcement from GEAI on their website. The announcement from GEAI went on to say, “A statement from the Department (DCENR) yesterday (2nd) confirmed that the study has been stopped after its first phase, which included an overall look at regulations and legislation governing fracking. Phase 2, on the ground studies in Leitrim and Fermanagh which would have included some drilling, will not proceed and a report of Phase 1 will be published in Q3 of this year”. Further down in the same statement from GEAI on February 3rd, the “Good News” headline lost it’s shine, GEAI went on to state,”It is great news that this has been confirmed. Basically, the study is stalled and, moreover, it is unlikely to proceed in the future”.
The use of the words “stalled” and “unlikely”, referring to something this important, on the first day of a general election raised alarm bells with many of us in the antifracking campaign.As already mentioned, Fine Gael TD Tony McLoughlin also released a press statement on the very same day. The first two lines of Mr.T McLoughlin’s statement read, “Fine Gael TD for Sligo Leitrim, Tony McLoughlin, has strongly welcomed the decision of the Minister for State, Joe McHugh TD, not to proceed with Phase 2 of the EPA’ s Joint Research Programme into the potential effects of hydraulic fracking in Ireland.“ T he decision to put Phase 2 of the EPA study into the potential health and environmental impact of Fracking on hold represents a considerable setback to those trying to promote fracking in our country ”.The following day a news report on Ocean Fm’s website stated, “assurances” given by Joe McHugh, Minister of State at the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources (DCENR), were welcomed by “a prominent antifracking group” .The Ocean Fm news report ends by stating, ” Aedin McLoughlin of the Good Energies Alliance says that in her opinion it’ s unlikely that the study will be resumed”. According to Ocean Fm, “…no official statement has been released by the Department of Communications”, but that, “the information was shared in a document between Fine Gael Election Candidate (Tony McLoughlin) and Minister (of State) with responsibility for Natural Resources Joe McHugh…”.The next line in the Ocean Fm report throws another spanner in the works,”The EPA has confirmed that it has been requested to pause the next phase of the research to allow time to review the multiple outputs of Phase 1”. Another news report on Ocean Fm’s website from the same day states, “The EPA has confirmed that it has been requested by the department of communications, energy and natural resources, to pause the next phase of its study into the effects of fracking in Ireland. According to a statement issued to Ocean FM this afternoon, the Environmental Protection Agency said that it was asked to do so, to allow its steering (committee) time to review the multiple outputs of Phase 1 and produce a report later this year.”It was becoming clear to many of us that this, “Good News” was being told in one way by a radio station and a very different spin was being put on it by GEAI and Fine Gael TD Tony McLoughlin. Many of us, who, at a grassroots level, without any funding, have been involved in the antifracking campaign in Ireland since we first learned Fianna Fail had signed off on licenses in the dying days of their government, exactly five years ago. We have been involved in and have tried to follow closely the events over the last number of years. Now with all the will in the world, many of us in the antifracking campaign would love to just accept this “official” news as GEAI have described it. But any sane Irish person knows that politicians will, time and time again, tell you what you want to hear once that election circus comes to town. And the difference between the way GEAI announced their, “Good News” and Fine Gael TD Tony McLoughlin when compared to what Ocean FM said is important, tangible and very revealing. This is how you spin a good story to win election brownie votes.Many of us in this campaign have requested ad nauseam, to see the “document”, or the “statement” from the department, as GEAI have described it. We contacted GEAI and were told to look here and there online and we would find it, that turned out to be a wild goose chase. As of yet, we are still waiting to see this “document” from the Minister or department that was released on the 2nd of Februrary according to GEAI and that supposedly assures us that phase 2 of the EPA’s research study “will not proceed”. If such a “document” exists, then anyone reading this will understand the importance of us seeing the exact content and wording of that “document”, we the public are entitled to see this so called “assurance” in black and white. If this “document” does actually exist and it does say Phase 2 of the EPA study is “not going to proceed” , then we would like that officially stated by the department and not a junior minister, but the Minister in charge of that department, Alex White. But having said all that, even if we got that official “statement” from the department and the Minister, would that stop the EPA from moving on to “Phase 2″, if instructed to do so by the next government, of course not.In his press release the day the election was called the Fine Gael candidate, Tony McLoughlin said, “Minister McHugh has stated that,“ i nitial indications of these results (from phase one of EPA research) are clearly pointing to the fact that the practice of Fracking would not be a viable option in Ireland” . I wonder what junior minister McHugh means by “viable”. Could it mean that because of the fact, that right now, the price of oil and gas is at an all time low and so fracking is, at the moment, economically not “viable” for the industry? If that is what the junior minister means when he is using the term “viable”, then we know only too well, that this situation can change at any time in the future from not “viable” to “viable” as the price of oil and gas can rise again.In other words there’s no money to be made from fracking in Ireland at the moment and even if there were plans to do test drills, the government and the industry know that there is too much resistance on the ground. Besides the industry is trying to get kick started in the U.K and N.I, and perhaps the industry and the government here in Ireland are willing to leave this plan for now, because of reasons aforementioned and wait and see how things pan out in the U.K. and NI first. So if you think about it, just a vague, worthless, incoherent mumbling about stalling fracking, spun well with the help of a “prominent antifracking” group at election time, to people in the Sligo/Leitrim constituency and beyond, would indeed be handy to desperate government party candidates. Why would the minister bother to elaborate and explain the situation fully, unequivocally and officially? Well one answer to that is, that by being vague and ambiguous, he can appear to be saying ‘nice’ things, in a “document” that we have not seen and these nice things will help Fine Gael and Labour candidates in constituencies where this issue is ongoing and extremely contentious. The other reason for being vague and ambiguous is that the junior minister is being careful not to cause a big hullabaloo among his seniors or scare off his friends in the oil and gas industry, which would greatly annoy his conservative friends in the U.K. and Northern Ireland who are doing the damndest to help get this industry off the ground.. Just keep it vague, confusing, that will work, without really saying anything at all.I believe the plan to announce the socalled “stopping” of the EPA research study was hatched some months back. I believe Fine Gael in this area, knowing an election was on the way, thought that an announcement on this issue, delivered at election time, would help claw back vital votes they have lost because of their profracking stance to date. Wealthy businessman Gerry Reynolds, who is a Fine Gael hopeful election candidate, was the only councillor in Leitrim County Council to have actually voted for fracking in the past, so to help the situation something needed to be done on the ground.On February 10th myself and others protested at Enda Kenny’s election visit to Leitrim. Our message to Enda Kenny was simple and focused on what we believe to be extremely important issues that in the main get ignored or misrepresented by the media. We believe that right now, apart from fracking, there are other pressing, pertinent issues that need immediate attention and yet in many ways are also linked to fracking. Many of us also believe that given the obvious links between various campaigns going on right now in Ireland it is only natural that these campaigns should unite in solidarity and work with each other.So our message last week to Mr. Kenny was this; we are against the TTIP/TISA trade deals that would give corporations extraordinary powers over resources and citizens of this country, we demand a ban on fracking, we will never pay Irish Water one cent, we reject his government and it’s policies that have caused misery and pain for so many, for example the issue of abortion and homelessness and finally that we are supporting the candidates of the Right2Change movement in this general election. We didn’t get to meet Mr. Kenny, we were told by Gardai that it was an invite only event. Liam Breslin who is on the board of Good Energies Alliance Ireland Ltd (GEAI), (the company that made this announcement about the EPA study, alongside Fine Gael TD Tony McLoughlin) also turned up for Mr.Kenny’s election stop off in Leitrim. I askedMr.Breslin did he have an invite, because we had been told by Gardai if you didn’t you were not allowed in, Mr. Breslin said he did not have an invite, nevertheless after chatting to Gardai off he went to see Enda. When Mr.Breslin emerged from the event I asked him, as a Fine Gael supporter but also an antifracking campaigner, what did he say to Mr.Kenny in regards to fracking. Mr. Breslin told me he didn’t speak to theTaoiseach about fracking because he had already done so in December and because, “he (Enda Kenny) did everything we asked him to”.I believe everyone who is involved in the antifracking campaign is genuinely against fracking, maybe for many, if it wasn’t going to happen in their backyard they may not be involved at all, but that is par for the course in many campaigns ie. until it happens to you, you have little interest or understanding of what others are or may be faced with or going through. There are of course many reasons for a NIMBY (not in my backyard) attitude, the most obvious one of course is that the mainstream media do not really tell us the truth of, for example, what it is really like living in a small community threatened by and having to stand up to, the most powerful industry in the world, the oil and gas industry. I’ve always thought it shocking, the fact that RTE have never shown the award winning film “The Pipe”, which tells the story of what the people of Rossport in Mayo went through while standing up to the oil and gas giant Shell. For many campaigners the ongoing Shell 2 Sea campaign is a case study in what to expect if you dare to stand up to the state and the oil and gas industry.I have spoken to many people involved in the Shell 2 Sea campaign over the years. They described being disappointed many times over the years, even by some they believed to be on their side. But one thing that was repeated by many of the Shell 2 Sea campaigners that I met, was not to get comfortable and think that you can win by entering negotiations with the companies or the state. This point was, for many of them, a valuable lesson they learnt and that they obviously thought needed to be shared. I believe that the close political ties of some of the most prominent people in the antifracking campaign with Fine Gael, has steered the antifracking campaign at critical times in the wrong direction. This is a view that I share with many in the campaign. I freely admit that at times these close political ties have benefited the campaign. However, at other crucial times in the campaign, to avoid embarrassment to their political overlords or damage to the government publicly or electorally, decisions have been made, at times, by some in the campaign, to protect or facilitate Fine Gael and the government on the issue of fracking. Over the last number of years many meetings have taken place between some of these prominent, Fine Gael friendly, antifracking campaigners and councillors, TD’s, ministers, council officials, EPA officials and apparently, I have now learned the Taoiseach too. These meetings have taken place behind closed doors and the details of what the purpose of the meetings were, what was discussed and the outcomes of such meetings have not been documented or shared publicly. I do not believe you can lead a successful, credible, campaign unless there is transparency and room to question actions.The majority of us, in the grassroots antifracking campaign, believe we are not in negotiations with government parties, we are demanding a ban on fracking in Ireland, full stop. Yes, that goal does have various stages but those stages should endeavour to benefit our campaign not facilitate politicians, local councils or the government. The grassroots groups in this campaign work on many levels, we have been involved in lobbying politicians, a camp at Tamboran’s site in Fermanagh, public awareness, organising meetings, workshops, protests, travelling abroad to antifracking camps and conferences and offering support to anyone who may find themselves in court because of peacefully protesting against this industry. As I write, one campaigner in Fermanagh is having to deal with that situation of defending his right to be allowed to peacefully protest against fracking. Some grassroots campaigners from various groups have been there to support him through his trial, but if the truth be told, there should have been a much better response by the campaign as a whole in helping defend this protester’s basic rights, he is basically standing up on behalf of all of us in this campaign. his trial continues in March.Getting back to this election and the situation at hand. The fact that just a few days before the GEAI and Fine Gael TD Tony McLoughlin’s announcement on the EPA study, both Fianna Fail and Fine Gael Councillors voted against Ind candidate Declan Bree’s motion in Sligo County Council, to place a ban on fracking in the county development plan, speaks volumes about the true feelings of both parties on the issue. At the same time we have Fianna Fail and Fine Gael candidates in the election signing pledges stating that they are antifracking, the fact is even if they are, if anyone knows anything about traditional party politics in this country, it is extremely rare that TD’s from these will go against their party’s stance. Even if they do in most cases nothing happens. The Sligo Fine Gael and Fianna Fail councillors, wishy washy excuse that legally they could not support Bree’s motion, is rubbish, as proven by the fact that Leitrim County Council did enter a ban on fracking in their development plan and the sky did not fall in on them. Although these Fine Gael and Fianna Fail councillors in Sligo squirmed their way out of supporting Bree’s ban, days later we are supposed to accept, an election time promise, delivered secondhand, through a “document” from a Fine Gael junior minister to a Fine Gael TD. that supposedly no one in the campaign has seen apart from GEAI and perhaps the spokesperson of Love Leitrim who is also a member of GEAI. This is quite simply a joke. In reality, this announcement by GEAI and a Fine Gael TD, an announcement that we are supposed to be “delighted” about, amounts to nothing, It is a classic you scratch our back, we’ll scratch your back scenario eg. don’t question us as the leaders of the antifracking campaign because we are delivering results and Fine Gael are taking the right steps in moving towards a ban on fracking, so if you’re against fracking you can vote for us in the general election, a win win deal, right.The truth of the matter is that the most likely government that would allow fracking to go ahead in this country, is a government made up of Fine Gael, Labour or Fianna Fail. Fine Gael’s British counterparts, the Tories, as I write, are vigorously trying to push ahead with fracking all over the U.K, despite all the evidence against fracking and huge community resistance. The fact of the matter is that in Europe the oil and gas industry go hand in hand with right wing governments, that means with a right wing government in power here, the oil and gas industry will get what they want. That means a vote for Fine Gael in this election and Labour or Fianna Fail, is a vote closer to allowing fracking take place in this country. Our immediate problem right now is not fighting the fracking industry, but fighting to get rid of the politicians whose parties are the very ones, that if fracking is to be pushed through, like in the U.K, these are the parties that will do the pushing. So allowing Fine Gael to come out at election time and spout nonsense about pausing, stopping, stalling, halting, the EPA study, without questioning this announcement, is the height of political naivety in my view and once again protecting government parties at a critical time. Antifracking campaigners coming out announcing this nonsense alongside Fine Gael, is not only extremely disappointing but also very damaging to our campaign, when at a time, during an election we should be capitalising on the situation and using the opportunity to be heard and supporting good candidates who are truly antifracking and will really stand up and fight on our behalf over the next four years in the Dail. If Fine Gael were really “stopping” the EPA study, which is the first steps towards laying down the foundations for fracking in Ireland, then Fine Gael would be shouting this from the rooftops, as would their Labour party colleagues. We would have an official statement from the department and the actual Minister in charge of the department would have already sent out an official statement. The fact is all we have is mixed messages, spin and mutterings from a junior minister. This socalled “assurance” we have been given really amounts to nothing and to pretend we have won something, only benefits Fine Gael in this election and why in gods name would you do that, when Fine Gael is the party most likely to copy their Tory friends in the U.K. and open the door when the frackers come knocking.Politics is a dirty game and at election times you see strange things happening, we must always try to speak the truth and expose the spin during times like this and allow people the opportunity to question what is really going on behind the scenes. Fortunately, Fine Gael and their supporters were caught out on this worthless, EPA study, election stunt. I would say it isn’t worth the paper it’s written on, but as you know it’s not even written on any paper. I will continue to work with the people I have been working with for the last five years in this campaign, grassroots people, who are honest, open and transparent in their work in the antifracking campaign and people who at critical times in the campaign, would never put their political allegiances first by facilitating an election stunt that in reality is of no tangible benefit to our campaign. We will continue to fight to ensure we get a ban on fracking on both sides of the border on this island. Infrastrata an oil and gas company with a license in Antrim are trying to commence drilling for oil, meters from a reservoir that supplies drinking water to thousands of people throughout Belfast. We need Sinn Fein who are in power in Northern Ireland to come out with a clear statement regarding their stance on this situation.My view for what it is worth, is that we should support the Right2Change candidates in each constituency in this election, there is an alternative to the politics of elitism and dirty deals. Don’t fall for the election stunts. From a master of spin in Irish politics, when asked about politicians making false promises during elections, then Labour Minister, Pat Rabbitte infamously said, “ I sn’ t that what you tend to do during an election?”, at least he’s gone into retirement, let’s try and see that a few more TD’s from this government and the last one, are forced into joining him. At the election hustings organised by Love Leitrim, last Saturday night in Manorhamilton, many people from the audience tried to seek clarity on the issue of the EPA study. I also spoke and pointed out political ties in the campaign that I believe have facilitated this Fine Gael election announcement. After making these comments and wanting to explain why I was doing, so the MC on the night a green party member and a member of Love Leitrim shut the meeting down. Others also tried to get answers to questions from the election candidates about Minister Joe McHugh’s announcement regarding the EPA and other issues. Independent councillor Gerry Dolan was one of those people who has genuinely worked on this issue for years and without whom we may never have got a ban on fracking into the Leitrim County Council Development Plan.I am not surprised at the fact that I was stopped from raising concerns that many others in this campaign also share, this has happened before many times. We have also had to fight our corner before many times because on other occasions again we felt some were putting their politics before the campaign. Of course these things are never done in an overt, obvious way, that’s not how you get away with political stunts, these deals are done slyly and behind closed doors, anyone who understands Irish politics understands this. Aedin McLoughlin director of GEAI said to Sligo Today,“ I am very upset that a small number of protesters seem to consider public meetings to be an opportunity for anarchic disturbances for their own sake” . Dr. Aedin McLoughlin a former Fine Gael county councillor may describe the events on the night as “anarchic disturbances”, she has every right to her opinion. But the fact remains that the almost worthless, Fine Gael announcement that she also delivered with “delight” on the first day of the election, regarding the EPA research study, stinks of electioneering and there was only one party it was really designed to benefit. Some in the campaign believe we should wash our dirty linen behind closed doors, I disagree, I believe if we express our concerns and fears publicly, there is a chance we might stop these types of stunts from happening again in the future.Leah Doherty(member of No Fracking Ireland Network)MORE ON THIS TOPIC:
full article, links, comments http://frackingfreeireland.org/2016/02/18/election-hustings-or-hustling-everything-is-not-always-as-it-seems-especially-at-election-time/COMMENT BY GEAIA few important points:
Far from being a FG initiative, the main political activist for the Stop the Study campaign was Sinn Féin TD Michael Colreavy, who gave unfailing support to the campaign throughout.  Michael organised the room in Leinster House for a meeting that was packed and attended by politicians from all parties and quite a few Independents.  Michael also put pressure on the Joint Oireachtas Committee to call in the EPA to answer questions about the Study and during the 3-hour session twice asked very relevant questions of the EPA delegates.  He should get the credit he deserves.The Campaign was also especially supported by FF Senator Paschal Mooney, FG TD Tony McLoughlin, PBP Richard Boyd Barrett and Claire Daly.  Also, dozens of campaigners worked really hard during this time, writing emails, letters, drawing placards, coming to Dublin to the Rally, attending meetings, etc.  They also deserve so much credit.The main pressure on the Minister to do something about the Study came from ALL the campaigners, the questions from the floor of the Dáil, and the media and campaign reports about CDM Smith.Of course the campaign was more successful coming up to an election – that’s politics.  But the main driver for the campaign was the CDM Smith involvement and the fact that the tenders for the on-the-ground monitoring and drilling were due to go out in October.  We should be celebrating the success of the campaign, and take the learning from it in the planning of future campaigns.
—————————————————————————————-Timeline Stop the Study – http://goodenergiesalliance.com/geai-partisipation/

Campaign against Fracking in Ireland

STOP the STUDY Campaign, September-December 2015

Path of Stop the Study Campaign:Stop the Study

  1. Research – CDM Smith + QUB doc
  2. April 2015: America – effects of Fracking + NY Ban asked by EPA info, photos
  3. September 2015: EPA answered questions. Progress report showed study is being done by CDM + AMEC
  4. October 2015: Public Meeting Glenfarne infophotos
  5. November 2015: Stop the Study Rally Leinster House, Dublin – Global Frackdown Pariswhy Stop the Study?, video of the day
  6. December 2015: Climate March info
  7. December 2015: COP21, Meeting of a Joint Oireachtas Committee on EnergyRadio interview on fracking



Good news – it’s official!

The EPA Research Study on Fracking is now stopped. This study was targeted by the campaign against fracking as research showed the study was compromised – it was being led by companies with huge vested interests in the oil and gas industry. A statement from the Department (DCENR) yesterday (2nd) confirmed that the study has been stopped after its first phase, which included an overall look at regulations and legislation governing fracking. Phase 2, on-the-ground studies in Leitrim and Fermanagh which would have included some drilling, will not proceed and a report of Phase 1 will be published in Q3 of this year.“GEAI is delighted with this news. Before Christmas, Minister Joe McHugh, who has responsibility for Natural Resources, said that he had requested an interim report from the EPA. It is great news that this has been confirmed. Basically, the study is stalled and, moreover, it is unlikely to proceed in the future – we understand that the contract with the lead research contractor – CDM Smith – finishes in August this year, two years from signing.However, the campaign does not end. Now we will push for legislation that will ensure that fracking is never introduced into Ireland – the last hurdle. We are launching the “SIGN THE PLEDGE” campaign on Friday – asking all candidates to sign a pledge to support legislation to ban fracking in Ireland permanently.”

Study on Fracking in Ireland is Discredited.

  • A research study on fracking in Ireland, north and south, is currently in progress, administered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • The research study has been contracted to a group led by CDM Smith, a U.S. pro-fracking consultancy providing services to the oil and gas industry. They are carrying out most of the work.
  • Amec Foster Wheeler is the second major player in the study. Amec is a oil/gas industry consultant whose clients include BP, Shell, BR Petrobras, GDF Suez and ExxonMobil.  This study is being written by the industry for the industry.
  • The Oireachtas has been misled about who is undertaking the study. (Queen’s University Belfast (QUB) have played no part in the research since October 2014.)
  • There is unacceptable secrecy surrounding this research. Interim reports are not being made public; no public participation is allowed before the final report is published; no independent external peer review is planned.
  • This study is not independent yet is intended to underpin government policy on fracking. It is not looking at whether fracking should be permitted; instead it is looking at how fracking can be rolled out.  It is not fit for purpose.
  • Current plans (October) include the issuing of tenders by EPA for risky seismic testing and air and water monitoring across the Island, providing valuable information to the fracking companies.
  • The Irish taxpayer is effectively giving a subsidy of €1.5 million to the oil and gas industry for this study.

We call on Government, in particular the Ministers for the Environment and for Energy, to direct the EPA to STOP THE STUDY related to the “Environmental Impacts of Unconventional Gas Exploration & Extraction (UGEE)” immediately and to cancel the issuing of supplementary tenders for on-the-ground seismic testing and other monitoring tasks relating to this work.The current study, designed in 2012, is out of date.  Over half of the available studies on the adverse impacts of fracking have been published since January 2014. In 2014, 192 peer-reviewed studies on the impacts of fracking were published. In the first six months of 2015, 103 studies appeared[1]“It is clear from the existing literature and experience that HVHF (fracking) activity has resulted in environmental impacts that are potentially adverse to public health” (NY State DOH Public Health Review)[2].We call for a review of the health impacts of fracking that considers the findings of all relevant peer-reviewed studies and reports, based on the methodology of the NY State DOH Public Health Review (December 2014), to be carried out by the Chief Medical Officer, under the auspices of the HSE and the Department of Health.

Important links

CDM Smith article “Between a Rock and a Resource”AMEC Foster Wheeler Mission StatementEPA study – who’s doing what –  Matrix of research teamQueens University FOIEPA letter re QUB date of opting out of consortiumText of Minister White response to PQ 16th June 2015  … the consortium includes … Queens University Belfast, Amec Foster Wheeler and Philip Lee solicitors, each offering a particular specialism required by the project scope.Terms of Reference of Research Study UGEE Research Programme——————————————————-

Email template for local politicians

Dear Fracking is not a local issue.  Nationally, it threatens our two most important industries – agriculture and farming.  At present, a study that is to inform Government policy on fracking is proceeding, but not as envisaged.

  • Effectively, the study has been taken over by two consultancy firms who are working for oil and gas companies, including BP and Shell.  The study is not independent.
  • The main objective of the study – to answer the question: “Can UGEE projects/operations be carried out in the island of Ireland whilst also protecting the environment and human health?”  – was written out of the research tasks and human health is ignored.
  • The next phase of the “research” is the issuing of tenders for a number of seismic testing and ground monitoring stations north and south of the island, providing valuable information to the fracking companies.  These tenders are due to be issued immediately.
  • The study does not examine WHETHER fracking should be allowed; instead it looks HOW it can be rolled out in Ireland.  It is not fit for purpose.

We suggest that you submit the following Notices of Motion to your Local Authority:

  1. Given that a) serious questions must be asked about the independence of the EPA-administered research study on “Environmental Impacts of Unconventional Gas Exploration & Extraction (UGEE)” (fracking) and b) the scope of the study which does not review public health impacts of fracking, this Council calls on Government, in particular the Ministers for the Environment and for Energy, to direct the EPA to stop the study immediately and to cancel the issuing of supplementary tenders for on-the-ground seismic testing and other monitoring tasks relating to this work.
  2. This council calls for a review of the public health impacts of fracking that considers the findings of all relevant peer-reviewed studies and reports, based on the methodology of the NY State DOH Public Health Review (December 2014), to be carried out by the Chief Medical Officer, under the auspices of the HSE and the Department of Health.


Press Releases

EPA Admits Serious Flaws in Fracking Research Study
at Dáil Committee Meeting   

Environmental Groups & Supporters Vow to Ramp Up Campaign to Stop the Study & Ban Fracking in IrelandMark Ruffalo & New Yorkers who banned fracking last year due to human health risks encourage the Irish people to join the campaign against fracking in IrelandDublin – Members of the Campaign against Fracking in Ireland, including Good Energies Alliance Ireland, Love Leitrim, Friends of the Earth, and Irish-American campaigner Julia Walsh from the New York-based NGO Frack Action attended Wednesday’s meeting of a Joint Oireachtas Committee on Energy in which TD’s questioned EPA following reports that the EPA-led study is being carried out by the oil and gas industry providers CDM Smith and AMEC. TDs rigorously questioned EPA Assistant Director General Dara Lynott and Research Manager Dr Brian Donlon for 3 hours.EPA admitted at the committee meeting to serious flaws in the research study including:

  • That no public health research or researchers with medical expertise are included in conducting the fracking research study.  They confirmed that, as a result of this research study, EPA will not be able to tell the Irish people whether fracking is safe for human health.
  • EPA confirmed that Achilles procurement, an oil and gas industry provider, helped to draft the Terms of Reference of the study, which provide the framework for the study. They were involved in the administration of the tender process which resulted in the contract being awarded to CDM Smith.
  • EPA confirmed that there will be no public comment or participation as part of the finalisation of the fracking research study, including no external, independent peer review process.
  • EPA admitted that the study is very small-scale, studying the environmental impacts of just one fracked well.  There are no studies considering the cumulative impacts of the thousands of wells planned for Ireland.
  • EPA admitted that when tenders were sought, the evaluation committee looked for experts in fracking rather than independent researchers.  The result was that the main contractors, CDM Smith and AMEC, are present or past members of the Marcellus Shale Coalition, an industry group that publicly promotes fracking.  The EPA admitted that they knew the contractors were members of the industry group but denied that this was “hopeless conflict of interest” (as suggested by TD Richard Boyd Barrett).
  • In the research study there is no consideration of greenhouse gas emissions caused by fracking, although the EPA admitted that fracking would increase carbon emissions and make it even more difficult for Ireland to achieve its 2020/2030 emission targets.
  • The EPA confirmed that they did not notify the JOC committee of the major change in status of Queen’s University (QUB’s) involvement in the research study last June.  They actually promoted QUB as a consortium member at this time, using their involvement to establish the independence of the research study.  The TDs were only made aware of the change in QUB status after the campaigners alerted them, following Freedom of Information Act requests.

“Our worst fears were confirmed. The Irish Government has given over its authority to the oil and gas industry, which is controlling the process of this study every step of the way, right from the beginning.  The abysmal failure of the EPA’s fracking research study and the confirmation of its flaws were apparent throughout the meeting on an issue that could impact the lives of millions of Irish people.  This process is beyond fixing and must be stopped in its tracks.  The question the public want answered is how fracking will impact human health in Ireland and this is not even on the agenda of the study.  It is totally disgraceful that taxpayer’s money is being used on a study that does not answer the essential question but instead is designed to support the oil and gas industry in their applications for exploration and extraction licences,” said Dr. Aedín McLoughlin, Director, Good Energies Alliance Ireland.During the committee meeting, TDs cited the research from the New York State Department of Health that led to New York State’s ban on fracking because it posed serious public health risks to New Yorkers. The question was asked how, if fracking is not safe for New Yorkers’ public health, it could be safe for Irish public health. “I have no idea” was the answer from the EPA.“My fellow New Yorkers and I are working together with Ireland’s anti-fracking campaigners because if fracking is not safe for New York then it’s not safe for Ireland!” said actor and advocate Mark Ruffalo. “New York banned fracking because the State Department of Health and Department of Environment conducted years-long independent studies on the environment and public health and safety risks of fracking, concluding that fracking is not safe for human health. The governments of Ireland and Northern Ireland have behaved irresponsibly in having the oil and gas industry conduct this study on fracking in Ireland. It’s always best to keep the fracking fox out of your hen house! As we have learned time and time again in the United States, the oil and gas industry cannot be trusted. I encourage the Irish people to join the campaign to stop fracking in Ireland. This study must be stopped and like New York, fracking should be banned in Ireland.”Campaigners, including New York campaigner Julia Walsh from the group Frack Action, are available for interviews.

“STOP THE STUDY” – Rising to a new Challenge

10-17-2015_Public Meeting Glanfarme (104)At a most successful meeting in Glenfarne last Saturday, attended by over 120 people, the case for opposing the  so-called research study on fracking in Ireland coordinated by the EPA was made clear.  The meeting started with a number of speakers giving the case for concern.  This was followed by a panel discussion and plan of action. Continue reading